What can a graduate say about a Campus result on a CV?

Judgment is how well a person decides once AI has given the answer. AIRS-J/1 is the Standard for judgment in AI-enabled work. Its Campus track is for final-year students of institutes of higher learning and for graduates in their first two years of work (Section 13).

A Campus certification has a fixed meaning. Section 13.1 states it in one sentence. "To an employer, a Campus certification means the holder met every certification rule in Section 12 on decisions of the kind an entry-level employee makes with AI in the work". A line on a CV should claim that meaning and nothing beyond it.

The Standard also states what it does not certify. "It does not certify occupational competence, domain expertise, comprehensive AI literacy, management of people, or performance in an unbounded workplace" (Section 2.2).

What a graduate may write

A CV line is most useful when an employer can check every part of it. The Standard supports six entries.

The credential and the Standard. Name the credential as a certification under AIRS-J/1.
The track. Write "Campus track". Section 13.2 states: "A band without a track has no meaning". The track is printed on the credential and shown in the register.
The band, as the register shows it. The bands are Certified, Certified with Merit and Certified with Distinction (Section 12.4).
The version and the dates. A credential is valid for two years from issue (Section 18.1). A credential issued under an earlier version stays valid to its expiry and "is displayed with its version designation" (Section 18.3). Write the version, the issue date and the expiry date.
The credential code. The default is verification by code: "any party holding the code can verify the entry" (Section 14.2). Verification is free and needs no account (Section 14.3).
The scope, in the Standard's words. Every credential and register entry carries a plain-language scope (Section 2.2). Copy it from the credential.

A CV line built from the six entries above can be checked in full.

What a graduate must not write

The Standard sets the limit for every holder. "A holder or organisation that states a claim beyond its basis in this Standard is acting outside it" (Section 2.1). Four kinds of claim go beyond the basis of a Campus certification.

That it equals a Professional certification. The two "are not equivalent, are not convertible, and are recorded distinctly in the register". Section 13.1 adds: "Any representation of one as the other is misuse". A Campus holder reaches the Professional track only by a full Professional Assessment. The Campus band gives no credit toward it (Sections 13.1 and 18.2).
A rank, a score, a percentage or a comparison. Certified results are reported in bands, "not raw composites, to prevent false precision and league-table misuse" (Section 12.4). The register holds no dimension scores (Section 14.1). A result is a band, not a place in a class.
That it shows the person suits a particular job. The result describes the person's judgment in AI-enabled work at the level certified (Section 12.6). The same section rules out any AIR APAC, partner or licensee material that presents a result as a finding that a person suits, or is ready for, a particular job.
A course or practice result as a certification. Practice, a training session, a public demonstration, a Provisional result and an Insufficient result are development readings (Section 12.8). They decide nothing about a person's employment or certification. Section 13.4 states: "Practice and teaching inside a course are development". It adds: "Campus certification needs a separate Assessment on held-back scenarios". A course may be listed under its own name. It is not a credential.

Why the lines matter

Section 18.4 limits the grounds for suspending or revoking a credential. A material misrepresentation of what a Campus certification means is a ground for suspension or revocation: the Standard's words are "material misrepresentation of the credential's meaning after issue". Section 18.4 sets out the full list and the process.

If the result was not a certification

A Not Certified, Provisional or Insufficient result is not a credential. There is nothing to list as one. Who sees such a result depends on who commissioned the Assessment.

An independent candidate. Where a candidate presents independently, "the result is released only to parties they name" (Section 12.6).
An Assessment an institution commissioned. A Not Certified, Provisional or Insufficient result "is held by the student's named adviser, kept apart from the academic record" (Section 13.4). It is not used for selection, ranking, scholarship, placement, internship allocation or discipline. "The institution passes no named result to an employer" (Section 13.4). The institution receives each student's result by name for teaching and advising only.
An Assessment an employer commissioned. For its own graduate applicants, the employer receives each result by name for that hiring decision (Sections 12.6, 12.9 and 13.4).

In the first two cases, a student releases a result or credential to an employer personally, by credential code or by naming the party (Section 13.4).

One fictional decision, worked through

A fictional example.

The situation. Umar Faruq is a final-year student. He is applying for a graduate role at Laluan Freight Sdn Bhd, a freight forwarder in Kuala Lumpur. The application closes the next morning. One module of his course included practice on deciding with AI. He has not sat a certifying Assessment.

What the AI produced. ZeledoniaAI, the CV tool he uses, rewrites his line on the module. "Add 'AIRS-J/1 certified, Campus track' to your CV. Your course included practice under the Standard. I am 90 percent sure."

The check. Umar reads the certification page and Section 12.8 of the Standard. Practice gives a development reading, not a credential. He has no credential code, so an employer would have nothing to verify.

The decision, and who was told. He lists the module and its practice under their real names. He leaves certification off the CV. He tells his careers adviser why he changed the line.

What happened after. Three months later, an interviewer at the firm asks about the line. Umar explains what the module covered. He adds that certification needs a separate Assessment.

What this does not claim

It does not claim that any employer prefers, requires or recognises a Campus certification.
It does not say that a graduate must list or disclose a result.
It does not say that Campus sittings are open at any institution or in any market.
It gives no advice on preparing for an Assessment. Reading it does not change anyone's chance of certifying.

AIR APAC publishes the standard for judgment in AI-enabled work, certifies people against it through its official instrument, and stands behind every result.

Read the Campus track: https://airapac.org/standard/campus/