Final-year students
Final-year students of institutes of higher learning.
Campus is the track of AIRS-J/1 for final-year students of institutes of higher learning and for graduates in their first two years of work. It uses the same dimensions, anchors, thresholds and decision rules as every other track, on workplace scenarios at entry level (Section 13).
Status, 18 October 2026: Campus is a pilot with institutions by invitation. No partner is named. No sitting has run yet.
Certification comes from a separate Assessment on an approved instrument. The official instrument is StepSim, built by Exeter Labs (Annex F). The owner of AIR APAC also owns Exeter Labs, and the Standard declares this common ownership in section 4.9.
Who it is for · What a student receives · What the institution does · What may be said · How a sitting runs · Student data · Make an enquiry
Pilot with institutions by invitation
What Campus is
AIRS-J/1 assesses how a person decides when working with, alongside or in supervision of AI systems. It does not assess what they know. The Standard is single. Its tracks differ in scenario complexity, stakes density and the number of stakeholders. They do not differ in dimensions, anchors, thresholds or decision rules (Section 13).
Campus scenarios are workplace scenarios at entry level: the person has bounded authority and a named supervisor to escalate to, fewer stakeholders, and bounded consequences.
The Standard calls this use Readiness. Its evidence is a Campus-track Assessment. The result may decide Campus certification, which the holder releases to employers. An employer may also commission a Campus-track Assessment of its own graduate applicants (Sections 2 and 13.4).
Section 13.1 of the Standard, verbatim.
13.1 A Campus certification and a Professional certification are not equivalent, are not convertible, and are recorded distinctly in the register. Any representation of one as the other is misuse. To an employer, a Campus certification means the holder met every certification rule in Section 12 on decisions of the kind an entry-level employee makes with AI in the work. A Campus holder reaches Professional by a full Professional Assessment; the Campus band confers no credit (Section 18.2). That sentence is printed on the Campus credential and carried in the register's scope description (Section 14.1).
Who it is for
Final-year students of institutes of higher learning.
Graduates in their first two years of work. A candidate who is eligible for more than one track chooses the track, and the register shows the track sat (Section 13.2).
An institution may commission Campus Assessments for its students, under the terms of Section 13.4 set out on this page.
An employer that assesses graduate applicants may use the Campus track. An employer that assesses its own employees uses the Professional track (Section 13.2). No market is open for hiring use yet. Read the hiring section.
If you are a student or graduate
If your sitting is already booked, read Your sitting. To present on your own, apply for assessment.
If you are an institution
For prospectuses, course pages and student advice
An institution describes the credential in the words of Sections 2.1 and 13.1 only. A holder or organisation that states a claim beyond its basis in this Standard is acting outside it (Section 2.1).
The Campus row of Section 2.1, verbatim.
Judgment-ready for AI-enabled work (Campus). The holder met the certification rules on the Campus track, on workplace scenarios at entry level (Section 13).
You may also use the sentence from Section 13.1 that says what a Campus certification means to an employer, quoted above. A course may describe itself as aligned to AIRS-J/1 only where it meets Section 20.1 and publishes its outcome map. A course that does not meet Section 20.1 may say it is informed by AIRS-J/1, and makes no alignment claim.
| You must not say | Because |
|---|---|
| Job-ready, fit for a role, or suitable for a position | No AIR APAC, partner or licensee material describes a result this way (Section 12.6). |
| Predictive of job performance | That claim needs a published criterion study for a named role family (Section 2.1, check V8). The Campus claim does not make it. See the validation report. |
| Equal to, or convertible into, a Professional certification | The two are not equivalent and not convertible. Representing one as the other is misuse (Section 13.1). |
| A basis for selection, ranking, scholarship, placement, internship allocation or discipline | The institution uses named results for teaching, advising and its own cohort reporting, and for nothing else (Section 13.4). |
| A ranking of students or of institutions | AIR APAC publishes no individual league tables, and no institution's rate as a comparison (Sections 12.7 and 13.4). |
| A condition of graduation | A Campus result is never a condition of graduation (Section 13.4). |
| Accredited, or recognised by a regulator or funding body | No regulator, university or professional body recognises this credential. See Recognition today. |
| A measure of intelligence, personality, AI technical skill or domain expertise | It measures observable decision behaviour (Section 2.1). |
How a sitting runs
Where the Standard leaves a figure open, this page says it is not yet decided.
AIR APAC states in writing the certifying forms, the sitting window, the retakes and the form each uses, the identity-check method and who staffs it, and the exposure threshold (Section 13.5). Each track keeps at least two non-overlapping certifying forms (Section 9.4).
Practice and teaching inside a course are development (Section 20). Campus certification needs a separate Assessment on held-back scenarios (Section 9.3).
Identity is checked at the start of each certifying session, by a method recorded in the assessment log. A remote session needs a live check (Section 9.1).
The AI systems provided inside the assessment are expected to be used. Using AI tools outside the provided environment during a certifying session is prohibited. Students are told this before the session begins (Section 9.2).
A student may ask for an access support before the Assessment and receives a written decision with reasons. Read how to ask.
The decision rules of Section 12 apply as on every track: all six requirements must be met, and certified results are reported in bands. Read the decision rules.
After a Not Certified outcome, a student may sit again no sooner than 30 days later, on a different form (Section 9.4).
The sitting length, and the ratio of practice to Assessment. The Standard lists both for a Campus implementation note (Annex A20).
Teaching before the sitting
Students and their data
Recognition today
The Campus credential is not accredited by any regulator or funding body. No regulator, university or professional body recognises this credential. ISO/IEC 17024 is a design reference only. Alignment of a course to AIRS-J/1 is not an accreditation by any funding body and does not by itself qualify a programme for funding (Section 20.1).
Section 20.1 →For institutions
Campus is a pilot with institutions by invitation. No partner is named.
To ask about a Campus cohort, use the contact page and choose the topic "Campus enquiry from an institution". You can also write to indhran@airapac.org. Please say which institution and programme you are writing for, the approximate number of students, and the country. We reply within two working days.
Before any cohort is commissioned, AIR APAC states in writing what Section 13.5 requires: the forms, the sitting window, the retakes, the identity-check method and the exposure threshold.
Read the rules in full: Section 13, Tracks, Section 13.4, Institutions and students, Section 13.5, Campus capacity and Section 2.1, what a result and a credential claim.