Publications and evidence, newest first.

One feed for everything AIR APAC publishes: Pulse editions and country reports, the white paper, the index data, the Standard and its review trail, and the adoption tools. Every row names its family, its format and its unit of analysis, dates itself, and says what opens when clicked. Nothing here is gated: every download opens without a form, an account or an email address.

Family
Language

12 of 12 shown

October 2026

  • Tools · Individuals Tool

    AI desk plan template

    One page, written by the person who owns AI in an office: three tasks sorted into Draft, Help with and Must not own, then one brief that carries the ground rules.

    Markdown file, 2 KB. Belongs to the Level 1 course pack; will open from the Level 1 page once published.

  • Tools · Individuals Tool

    Level 1 homework sheets

    Four sheets, one per week of Level 1, from which tasks to hand an engine to the desk plan that goes back to the Secretariat.

    Markdown file, 4 KB. Belongs to the Level 1 course pack; will open from the Level 1 page once published.

  • Standard · Individuals Standard

    AIRS-J/1 v2.0, the AI Readiness Judgment Standard

    Nine judgment dimensions across four domains, with the anchors and thresholds open, and a credential issued only by a separate assessment on the official instrument.

    Standard, permanent URL. Opens direct on airapac.org at /standard/v2-0.

September 2026

  • Evidence · Organisations and places Data

    AI Readiness Pulse, Q2 2026

    1,000 organisations published by name from 5,820 candidates screened across 23 markets and six sectors, with a country dossier for each of the 22 scored markets.

    Regional report, 132 pages, 10.7 MB, and 22 country dossiers of 20 pages each. Country PDFs open direct; the edition page lists all 23 items.

    Macau is the 23rd market and carries no benchmark block, so it is reported as contextual and unranked rather than scored.

  • Evidence · Organisations Data

    AI Readiness Index, Q2 2026, the published 1,000

    The edition as a table, one row per published organisation: name, domain, market, sector, RPS, adjusted RPS, visibility tier and evidence confidence. The rows keep the file's own order.

    CSV, 116 KB, 1,000 rows. Opens direct, no form and no email address.

  • Evidence · Organisations Report What did not work

    Q2 2026 Coverage Report

    What the method could not see in Q2 2026: the markets, sectors and entity types the public signals reach least, published as the edition's own limit.

    PDF, 116 pages, 0.7 MB. Built with the edition. Not yet served from airapac.org.

  • Evidence · Organisations Data What did not work

    Unresolved entities, Q2 2026

    The 368 candidates whose domain the pipeline could not resolve, listed by domain, company name, sector and market so the gap can be checked line by line.

    CSV, 23 KB, 368 rows. Not yet served from airapac.org.

  • Evidence · Organisations Article

    How the Q2 2026 Pulse is built

    The method in the open: RPS as public-evidence visibility, adjusted RPS, the country-level CERS and CRP adjustments, and the evidence gate a candidate has to clear.

    HTML page. Opens direct on airapac.org.

  • Evidence · Organisations Article What did not work

    What this index cannot tell you

    The published limits of the Q2 2026 Pulse, held at the same detail internally, starting with the headline limit that markets cannot be ranked against each other.

    HTML page. Opens direct on airapac.org.

  • Standard · Individuals Standard

    How AIRS-J/1 v2.0 was reached: five review documents

    The critique of v1.0, the working criteria, the second pass, the v2.0 review draft and the StepSim rebuild plan, kept together as the record of how the version was decided.

    Five Markdown documents, 14 September 2026. Held in the standards review folder, not yet served from airapac.org. The changelog records the versions that are public.

    • AIRS-J-1-v1.0-critique-2026-09-14.md, the critique of v1.0
    • AIRS-J-1-working-criteria-2026-09-14.md, the working criteria
    • AIRS-J-1-second-pass-2026-09-14.md, the second pass
    • AIRS-J-1-v2.0-review-draft.md, the v2.0 review draft
    • AIRS-J-1-stepsim-rebuild-plan-2026-09-14.md, the StepSim rebuild plan

April 2026

  • Evidence · Organisations Report

    Bridging the AI Readiness Gap in Asia Pacific

    The inaugural white paper, v2: 510 mid-market companies scored across five markets and six sectors, and the APAC Data Desert finding that a pipeline returning no data cannot tell an invisible company from an unready one.

    PDF, 44 pages, 1.1 MB, English. Open the English PDF · report page.

    English Korean, the same item

  • Evidence · Organisations Report

    Asymmetric Visibility: the AIR APAC Mid-Market Readiness Index, Q1 2026

    The Q1 2026 findings report: six findings from 510 companies, led by the 70 percent of mid-market APAC companies that publish too little observable signal to be assessed with confidence.

    PDF, 43 pages, 0.6 MB, six findings. Opens direct, no form and no email address.

Publication cadence

A structured rhythm of evidence.

Monthly

Brief

Two to three pages. One signal, one visual, one policy implication. Distributed to subscribers and council partners.

Bi-monthly

Feature

Ten to fifteen pages. A thematic deep dive across one of three streams: sector readiness, asymmetric visibility, or governance signals.

Quarterly

Index

The AI Readiness Pulse: full organisation-level scoring across APAC markets, with tier placements and methodology notes.

Annual

Flagship

Longitudinal comparison, sector deep dives, and the governance signals digest. First year-on-year publication in early 2027.

Standard notes

The standards programme, on the record.

A category for writing about AIRS-J/1 as it moves: what the clauses mean, what governance decides, and what the evidence says even when it weakens a claim.

01

Clause explainers

Plain-language walkthroughs of the rubric: the nine dimensions, the anchors, the evidence rules, and the decision rules. Begins with the dimensions.

02

Governance updates

Review-board reviews and recorded dissents, version releases, and changes to the standard, recorded per version.

03

Findings

Reliability, fairness, and validity results that show a claim needs strengthening, and what AIR APAC changed in the next release.

Read the changelog The Standard
Forthcoming

In the pipeline.

The Confidence Floor

Q2 2026 brief. What raises a low-confidence organisation to medium: the lowest-cost interventions, the signal-density threshold, and what visibility buys.

The Index, Year 1

Annual flagship, early 2027. First longitudinal comparison and sector deep dives.

Tourism collaboration, inaugural issue

Urban tourism AI readiness, asymmetric visibility in travel discovery, and AI governance signals for tourism. Co-published with a partner in the Asia Pacific cities tourism network. Working paper status pending sign-off.

How this index is kept honest

Every row states its family and its unit of analysis, because the next action has to match the unit. An organisation piece leads to the market and index evidence, a place piece leads to readiness for places, and an individual piece leads to the Standard. No row leads from a Pulse result to certification.

Artefacts in the Evidence and Standard families open with no form, no account and no email address. The one email list on the site is a quarterly notification, not a key to anything.

Looking for the current edition?

The live site carries the Q2 2026 Pulse, the market pages and the data download. Write to us if a published entry needs a correction.

Read the Pulse on airapac.org